Hiring the right person is, without question, the most important measure of any Talent Acquisition function. But that doesn’t mean you have all the time in the world to do it.

Slow hiring costs money, plain and simple. And it’s easier than you might think to put a reliable number on how much it’s costing you.
Here’s a typical example, worked through step by step:
Total cost of the delay: $35,100
That money disappears with no return of any kind. Worse, these problems are usually systemic, so the same losses repeat across every role you hire for.
That $35,100 assumes your first-choice candidate makes it all the way to day one. Often, they don’t.
Here’s how to account for the ones you lose:
Step 1: Score the candidate who made it all the way through the process as 1.
Step 2: For each preferred candidate who dropped out (frustrated by delays or snapped up by another employer), assign a score based on how far they got. Someone who got halfway to signing scores 0.5.
Step 3: Multiply the total cost by each score and add it to your running total.
It’s not an exact science. But by mapping your typical candidate journey and noting where you lost each person, you can reach a reasonably reliable estimate.
Say it took three preferred candidates to fill the role: one dropped out halfway through, another at the 75% mark. The calculation looks like this:
$35,100 + ($35,100 × 0.5) + ($35,100 × 0.75) = $78,975
That’s more than double the original figure, for a single role.
Try the calculation for yourself. You may be surprised how much slow, inefficient hiring is costing you.
To dig deeper and base your decisions on hard data, track these metrics across every role, business unit and stage of your talent pipeline:
Combine these metrics with the calculation above, and you’ll uncover some hard truths about how slow hiring is holding back your growth.

AI is reshaping payments faster than anyone can plan for, which makes long-term hiring decisions risky. Here’s why interim talent is the smart way to fill gaps like AI-driven fraud detection now, while staying flexible for whatever comes next.

Is your hiring driven by data or by gut feeling? Many talent acquisition teams believe they’re making smart, strategic choices, but without the right processes, tools and metrics in place, instinct often ends up calling the shots. In this article, we explore five telltale signs that your TA function is running on instinct, and what you can do to build a more effective, evidence-based approach to hiring.